Thursday, 9 February, 2012 5:45 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: buy, new investor, the university, premium managed, mark rothnie,
 

Super borrowing changes need clarifying

Confusion over certain types of borrowing

By Darin Tyson-Chan
Wed 17 Mar 2010

There have been calls for further work to be done to the change in super gearing rules.


The changes made to superannuation borrowing arrangements announced by the Superannuation Minister Chris Bowen last week has been seen as an amendment raising more questions than answers by certain superannuation industry practitioners.

According to Alpha Structured Investments founder Tony Rumble the changes leave doubt over the use of unlisted and self funded gearing by superannuation funds and specifically self-managed super funds (SMSFs).

"The new rules draw a bright line between the so-called 'traditional' installment warrants, for example ASX listed installments, and other types of SMSF gearing. DIY gearing into super and gearing products which aren't listed and the ASX are now seriously in doubt," he said.

The area that will cause SMSF trustees most concern is the ruling that individuals using traditional installment products will be viewed as owners of the asset pertaining to the borrowing arrangements absolving them from capital gains tax when the loan has been repaid, Rumble said.

"But the changes also clearly state that the ATO view unlisted and DIY instalments as potentially giving the instalment trustee an interest in the underlying asset - meaning that it's not clear that the investor can claim a tax deduction for interest expenses, and also making it possible for the ATO to impose capital gains tax when the loan is repaid," he said.

"Unless the industry can convince the government to change its mind, the only sensible course for investors will be to limit themselves to ASX listed installments," Rumble said.

In addition Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers believes the announcement did not clarify if gearing arrangements to acquire real estate were considered financial products.

According to the law firm this situation needs to be resolved so all parties involved know who it is that has to issue the product disclosure statement.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

IFM wins $500m infrastructure mandate »
IFM has been selected to lead CalSTRS' first foray into infrastructure.

Magellan firm amid European crisis »
The Magellan Global Fund remained fully invested during the past six months.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot