Wednesday, 8 February, 2012 9:05 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: insurance levels, morningstar s, richard called, australian product, jailed,
 

Industry groups defy Cooper's choice model

Higher administrative burden

By Christine St Anne
Mon 22 Feb 2010

Major industry bodies including ASFA, IFSA and the AIST have called for the Cooper review to dump its proposed choice architecture model.


Four key industry bodies have taken an unprecedented step by joining together to call for the Cooper review to take another look at its recommendations.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, the Investment and Financial Services Association, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees and the Corporate Superannuation Association do not want Cooper's proposed architectural model to be implemented.

In December 2009, Cooper recommended a choice architecture model as part of phase one of its review into superannuation.

"We believe the proposed model does not focus on the key issues of making the system more efficient, but seeks to fundamentally alter an existing structure that has served members well," a joint statement said.

The choice architecture model proposed universal and choice investment options for people depending on their level of engagement with superannuation.

The new model would have to establish separate fund structures to cater for the members categorised as either universal or choice, the four groups said.

"This would inevitably increase the administrative burden on the total fund, which would translate into higher, not lower costs per member," the group statement said.

"Requiring the separate trust structures, we believe, will erode the economies of scale that currently exist."

The model also fails to recognise that level of engagement is also a factor of age and stage of life, the groups said.

The groups also have "serious industry misgivings" about the lifecycle investment strategy proposed by the Cooper review.

"We believe that the existing system allows for trustees to focus not simply on costs, but also on returns for default options," the group statement said.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

GESB drops responsible share option »
GESB has dropped the AMP managed responsible investment option.

Axa flags fee cuts for North platform »
Axa Asia Pacific will reduce administration fees for its popular North platform in April.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot