Thursday, 9 February, 2012 4:55 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: butterworth, buttula, buy dealer, 31 july, buy-out,
 

True value

Kate Kachor
By Kate Kachor
Mon 12 Oct 2009

The issue of professional indemnity (PI) insurance has shifted up a gear with a jump in premiums for financial planners.


It's an ugly catch-22 for the sector - without PI, financial advisers cannot operate.

They cannot do their job and deliver advice to their clients. They also therefore cannot gain an income.

In the past 12 months, many PI insurers have been spooked by corporate collapses.

With QBE Insurance no longer providing cover for new clients, along with a compressed market of domestic insurers, there are rumours potential claims from the fall of Storm Financial, Great Southern and Timbercorp will push a second, and possibly a third, insurer to follow suit.

In a way you can't really blame the insurers for being disinterested in insuring Australia's advice market. Who would want to insure a sector that costs them too much time and money?

The thinking around time and money is now weighing heavily on the mind of the adviser.

In the past week, more than a handful of advisers have aired their views on the value of PI.

Many have groaned about the amount of money they are forced to pay each year for cover, complaining: "Why should I pay when I've never had a claim?"

As many advisers face renewals for their PI cover, with some firms experiencing premium hikes of up to 40 per cent, the hefty prices they are expected to pay could well price some advisers out of the market entirely.

For many this will mean leaving the industry or being forced to sacrifice their private status and join with a dealer group.

Another catch-22 situation perhaps?

Though interestingly, is it not high on a planner's list to inform their clients about the importance of going back to basics and having all your bases covered?

In may be a little bit of a simple comparison, and by no means do I mean to dilute the dire circumstances some face with increasing PI premiums, though without cover surely an individual planner's business would be worse off?

Advisers, like their clients, pay their cover for a reason - peace of mind.

How are you finding the current premium rates and insurers?

Are you getting a good deal or not?

IFA would be interested in knowing your situation with your PI.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

IFM wins $500m infrastructure mandate »
IFM has been selected to lead CalSTRS' first foray into infrastructure.

Magellan firm amid European crisis »
The Magellan Global Fund remained fully invested during the past six months.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot