Thursday, 9 February, 2012 10:46 AM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: the licensee, aep, toyota, fixed fee, ato rebate,
 

Australia Institute hits out at IFSA claims

Defends default fund policy

By Alice Uribe
Fri 19 Dec 2008

The think tank responds to criticism by IFSA that their recent default fund proposals will result in a contraction in the super industry.


Advertisement

The Investment and Financial Services Association's (IFSA) opposition to proposed changes to the default fund system is about protecting the financial services industry, according to The Australia Institute research fellow Josh Fear said.

"Rather than looking after the interests of super fund members, IFSA's position appears to be that the for-profit sector should be protected at all costs in the interests of competition," he said.

Fear said competition in the super sector is deficient because the vast majority of the workforce is highly disengaged from their superannuation and decline to make a choice about their fund.

"At the moment some funds feel compelled to give their members more than 100 investment options, all in the name of choice. But this is a meaningless choice for some people," he said. 

A report released earlier this week by the Australia Institute and Industry Super Network (ISN) proposed a set of criteria for default funds for people who did not exercise choice of fund.

These included capping fees and prohibiting the payment of ongoing financial advice fees, including commissions.

IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert said the implementation of such policies would mean a contraction of the super industry and a reduction in the number of funds.

"We want to make sure consumers can select from institutional or retail funds because that is what consumer preference is all about," Gilbert said.

However, Fear said retail funds could easily meet the new default standards that were proposed in the report.

"If retail funds want to look after members, they could easily meet these basic standards," he said.

"The for-profit sector can actually benefit from a default safeguard, but only if they provide a service that is in the interests of ordinary fund members rather than just wealthy customers."

Go to today's news

More stories by this author


 

InvestorDaily video:

Hot seat

Hot Seat... Part 2

In Part 2 of our exclusive series, we ask leading names to nominate their best investments, the most effective industry group and the importance of platforms.

InvestorDaily video:


Masterfunds Conference

When will the market recover?

Find out who's hot, who's not and who's predicting a quick recovery amongst the highlights of  The 8th Annual Wraps, Platforms & Masterfunds Conference

Christine St Anne

A fraction too much friction

No crystal ball, tarot cards or economist could ever have predicted what happened in 2008. ... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Asset Super alters equity portfolio »
Asset Super has overhauled its $325 million Australian equities portfolio and added two managers to its line-up.

Infrastructure firm boosts toll road operator stake »
Infrastructure investment manager CP2 has invested $253 million in toll road operating firm ConnectEast.

Kate Kachor

Is this how it ends?

It's hard to believe this day has arrived - the last edition of  IFA for 2008.... read more »

 

 
©2008 InvestorInfo Pty Ltd · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot