Wednesday, 8 February, 2012 8:30 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: greg roberts, adviser liability, 2007, freeman mcmurrick, russell combines,
 

Total control

Julia Newbould
By Julia Newbould
Mon 28 Jul 2008

Out and about last week, I heard an interesting theory on how to eliminate the numerous conflicts of interest many dealer groups have: get rid of dealer groups and in their place let financial planners be independently licensed.


Out and about last week, I heard an interesting theory on how to eliminate the numerous conflicts of interest many dealer groups have: get rid of dealer groups and in their place let financial planners be independently licensed.

It was an unpopular idea, but perhaps not one without merit.

Running a dealer group is expensive. Most are being subsidised by fund managers through platforms, rebates and other 'conflicted' means.

However, for the regulator to pick up the administration of 15,000 planners is probably not going to appeal.

The Australian Taxation Office is already struggling with the number of self-managed super funds (SMSF) it has to administer and this would be a similar logistical nightmare, albeit for a different regulator.

It would transform the financial services landscape in an interesting way.

While eliminating dealer groups would remove some conflicts of interest and, according to research, may make more people trust financial planners and seek advice, the reality would be different.

Currently, the big dealer groups offer some sort of safety net for investors and financial planning clients.

Without the backing of the big boys, such as Westpac, Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Colonial First Stat, maybe clients wouldn't feel as secure placing investments through smaller, independent planners.

The cost of advice is likely to increase greatly and that will put it out of the reach of many potential clients.

However, it was an interesting thought to ponder and with the proliferation of SMSFs and trustees being more used to dealing with accountants and their regulatory system, perhaps some people would be equally comfortable with advisers who hold similar licences.

Perhaps it will take the new generation of advisers to want a change to the system - those who do not want their licences to be held through a dealer group, which is only as reputable as its least reputable member.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Asset Super rejigs mandates »
Asset Super has finetuned its international and alternatives exposures.

AAS signs up REST »
REST has signed with AAS for another five years.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot