Wednesday, 8 February, 2012 8:45 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: benchmark index, mlc it, stephen chan, best financial, mark delaney,
 

Pandora's remains

Julia Newbould
By Julia Newbould
Mon 14 Jul 2008

When Pandora opened her mythical box, she released all the evils of mankind - disease, despair, malice, greed, old age, death, hatred, violence, cruelty and war - leaving only hope inside.


When Pandora opened her mythical box, she released all the evils of mankind - disease, despair, malice, greed, old age, death, hatred, violence, cruelty and war - leaving only hope inside.

In the same vein, by airing former FPA chairman John Hewison's views on fees and commissions on InvestorDaily last week, we opened the great debate once again for the financial planning community.

It's a never-ending argument. Transparency is the claim by both sides of the debate. Those who want fees believe there is no transparency without them, and those who prefer commissions believe that as long as there is transparency there is no problem.

I don't believe the argument is resolvable just yet.

The issue is never really one of fees versus commissions, it is conflicts of interest. This is a much bigger issue for industry and one that remains pertinent.

The argument ties in closely with platforms. It is the platforms that allow dealer groups a source of profitability, and pay for the many dealer services they need to attract advisers to their networks.

The deals struck with fund managers muddy the waters as to what is independent advice.

And this is an industry that trades on perceptions. Whether or not advice is unbiased is secondary to whether it looks unbiased.

There is also the situation of dealer groups and advisers being owned by fund managers. Many clients don't understand the relationships between an adviser's business and the adviser's licensee, which is not a terrible thing if they are actually clients.

But the majority of Australians who aren't clients of financial planners may be put off by the perceived conflicts.

It's food for thought. Let's focus on the remains of Pandora's box and assume the constant opening of the box will continue to show us hope that we will eventually resolve the issues at hand.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Asset Super rejigs mandates »
Asset Super has finetuned its international and alternatives exposures.

AAS signs up REST »
REST has signed with AAS for another five years.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot