Tuesday, 6 January, 2009 6:31 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: nabinvest, target portfolio, steel, mann investment, peter,
 

Public super funds the cheapest

Low operational costs

Vishal Teckchandani
By Vishal Teckchandani
Wed 28 May 2008

Public superannuation funds have lower fees than industry funds and master trusts, study shows.


Advertisement

Public superannuation funds are the best value funds as their low running costs enable them to charge lower fees than those of rival industry and public sector funds, a study has shown.

People who have a balance of $300,000 in a public fund have been charged 0.57 per cent a year on average in fees within the period from June 2005 to March 2008.

In the same period with the same amount of money, Australians invested in industry funds were charged 0.72 per cent a year.

People in corporate master trusts were charged 0.83 per cent a year and investors in personal master trusts were charged 0.94 per cent  per year.

The report was compiled by Sydney-based research firm Chant West Financial Services.

Public sector funds have managed to keep their costs low because they serve a small number of employers, have low promotional costs and fund contributions are mainly conducted electronically.

"These funds have the scale to keep their operating costs down, they have all the features that most members need and their returns have generally been strong," Chant West principal Warren Chant said.

The report showed that master trusts are costlier than not-for profit industry and public sector funds.

A person with $25,000 in a master trust is being charged twice as much as someone in an industry fund and nearly treble those with a public sector fund.

Industry funds have also increased fees each year from June 2005 to March 2008, while retail master trusts and public funds have had stable fees.

A person who invested $50,000 in an industry fund in March 2008 would be charged 0.83 per year in fees whereas investing the same amount in June 2005 would have incurred a fee 0.71 per cent.

Go to today's news

More stories by this author


 

InvestorDaily video:

Hot seat

Hot Seat... Part 2

In Part 2 of our exclusive series, we ask leading names to nominate their best investments, the most effective industry group and the importance of platforms.

InvestorDaily video:

Masterfunds Conference highlights

Masterfunds Conference

Latest: It's magic!

Check out the entertainment highlights from The 7th Annual Wraps, Platforms & Masterfunds Conference

Christine St Anne

Sexy risky business

Senator Nick Sherry is a man who has been rather active on the conference circuit of late.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Catholics revamp fixed interest »
Industry superannuation fund the Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund (CSRF) has revamped its fixed income portfolio.

Mercer backs alternatives »
Mercer has awarded $34.15 million in mandates to Tactical Global Management (TGM) and Lazard Asset Management to invest in alternative assets.

Julia Newbould

Truth in label

An interesting idea came to me last week regarding the issue of fee-for-service advice.... read more »

 

 
©2008 InvestorInfo Pty Ltd · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot