Sunday, 12 October, 2008 1:20 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: rating for, fseaa, bongiorno, marketing technology, portfolio manager,
 

Wrap time

By Julia Newbould
Mon 03 Sep 2007

While conflict of interest has stopped advisers receiving more by referring one product over another, volume bonuses continue to exist and are typically distributed in a more equitable way between dealer group and adviser.


Just less than a month away from IFA's seventh annual Masterfunds, Wraps and Platforms Conference, I have been pondering what has changed in the wrap space.

Since Asgard was launched by Sealcorp, now almost 20 years ago, what has changed? The advisers or distribution arms of financial services firms have seen their parts of the pie increase while the fund managers have faced a squeeze of sorts.

Sealcorp was the first to use the volume bonus structure now so common with wrap provision. After the big $272 million sale to St George in 1997, the company was faced with a group of eight advisers who were upset that they didn't get a part of the money.

They argued that it was their clients' money that allowed Sealcorp to achieve such a high sale price. After threatening to leave and take the money with them, they were given what is now known as volume bonuses. The master trust certainly used its distribution to build funds under management and rewarded its users for such.

While conflict of interest has stopped advisers receiving more by referring one product over another, volume bonuses continue to exist and are typically distributed in a more equitable way between dealer group and adviser. Yet, it is rare for the consumer to feel the real benefit of the rebates.

However, it may be argued that wraps have enabled advisers to spend more time with clients, giving them advice and focusing on their portfolios. It has also allowed them to use a wider range of products for clients.

In other news this week, the FPA has been given a rap by its members. Almost three-fifths of its members believe it has changed for the better, with nine out of 10 areas showing signs of improvement in terms of FPA performance, the exception being the promotion of the certified financial planner designation.

Go to today's news

More stories by this author


 

InvestorDaily video:

Hot seat

Hot Seat... Part 2

In Part 2 of our exclusive series, we ask leading names to nominate their best investments, the most effective industry group and the importance of platforms.

InvestorDaily video:

Masterfunds Conference highlights

Masterfunds Conference

Latest: It's magic!

Check out the entertainment highlights from The 7th Annual Wraps, Platforms & Masterfunds Conference

Christine St Anne

Reconstructing capitalists

A former colleague of mine once offered the opinion that industry superannuation funds are reconstructed socialists - despite their union influence, these funds have grown and benefited from a global capitalist world.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Catholics revamp fixed interest »
Industry superannuation fund the Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund (CSRF) has revamped its fixed income portfolio.

Mercer backs alternatives »
Mercer has awarded $34.15 million in mandates to Tactical Global Management (TGM) and Lazard Asset Management to invest in alternative assets.

Julia Newbould

These are the days of our lives

It seems each week, sometimes each day, another bank is nearing ruin or collapse.... read more »

 

 
©2008 InvestorInfo Pty Ltd · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot